Microbial Biofertilizers: Types and Applications

The increased dependency of modern agriculture on excessive synthetic input of chemical fertilizers has caused several environmental problems related to greenhouse effect, soil deterioration, and air and water pollution. Furthermore, there is an imperative need for viable agricultural practices on a global level with reduced energy and environmental problems, for adequate cost-efficient production of food for the increasing human population. Consequently, biofertilizers containing microorganisms like bacteria, fungi, and algae have been suggested as viable solutions for large-scale agricultural practices which not only are natural, ecofriendly, and economical but also maintain soil structure as well as biodiversity of agricultural land. Besides providing nutrient enrichment to the soil, microbial biofertilizers promote plant growth by increasing efficient uptake or availability of nutrients for the plants and by suppressing soilborne diseases. Biofertilizers supplement nutrients mainly by fixation of atmospheric nitrogen, by phosphorus solubilization, and by synthesizing plant growth-promoting substances. The nitrogen-fixing bacteria of the rhizobia and other groups are used for growth promotion of legumes and additional crops. In addition, blue-green algae (BGA) as well as Azolla subsidize in the nitrogen budget of practicable agriculture. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are important for the uptake of phosphorus and several other minerals in many plants. Phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria like Azotobacter and Azospirillum that fix atmospheric nitrogen can increase the solubility and availability of phosphorus to plants and, thus, crop yield. Further, Azospirillum provides additional benefits such as the production of growth-promoting substances, disease resistance, and drought tolerance. Thus, application of microbial biofertilizers is an effective approach in increasing and maintaining the nutrient economy of soil, thereby reducing the use of chemical fertilizers, for a proficient and sustainable agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Buy Now

eBook EUR 213.99 Price includes VAT (France)

Softcover Book EUR 263.74 Price includes VAT (France)

Hardcover Book EUR 263.74 Price includes VAT (France)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

Role of Microorganisms as Biofertilizers

Fungal Biofertilizers for Sustainable Agricultural Productivity

Efficacy of Biofertilizers: Challenges to Improve Crop Production

References

• Abd El-Lattief EA (2016) Use of Azospirillum and Azobacter bacteria as biofertilizers in cereal crops: a review. IJREAS 6:36–44 Google Scholar
• Alley MM, Vanlauwe B (2009) The role of fertilizers in integrated plant nutrient management. International Fertilizer Industry Association, Paris, p 59 Google Scholar
• Ansori A, Gholami A (2015) Improved nutrient uptake and growth of maize in response to inoculation with Thiobacillus and mycorrhiza on an alkaline soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 46:2111–2126 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Arnon DI, Stout PR (1939) The essentiality of certain elements in minute quantity for plants with special reference to copper. Plant Physiol 14:371–375 ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
• Audenaert K, Pattery T, Cornelis P, Höfte M (2002) Induction of systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2: role of salicylic acid, pyochelin, and pyocyanin. MPMI 15:1147–1156 ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barea JM, Brown ME (1974) Effects on plant growth produced by Azotobacter paspali related to synthesis of plant growth regulating substances. J Appl Microbiol 37:583–593 CASGoogle Scholar
• Bashan Y (1998) Inoculants of plant growth-promoting bacteria for use in agriculture. Biotechnol Adv 16:729–770 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Bashan Y, Holguin G (1997) Azospirillum-plant relationships: environmental and physiological advances (1990–1996). Can J Microbiol 43:103–121 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Bashan Y, Ream Y, Levanony H, Sade A (1989) Non-specific responses in plant growth, yield, and root colonization of noncereal crop plants to inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense Cd. Can J Bot 67:1317–1324 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Bashan Y, Harrison SK, Whitmoyer RE (1990) Enhanced growth of wheat and soybean plant inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense is not necessary due to general enhancement of mineral uptake. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:769–775 CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
• Bashan Y, Puente ME, Myrold DD, Toledo G (1998) In vitro transfer of fixed nitrogen from diazotrophic filamentous cyanobacteria to black mangrove seedlings. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 26:165–170 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Benson DR, Silvester WB (1993) Biology of Frankia strains, actinomycete symbionts of actinorhizal plants. Microbiol Rev 57:293–319 CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
• Bertrand H, Plassard C, Pinochet X, Touraine B, Normand P, Cleyet-Marel JC (2000) Stimulation of the ionic transport system in Brassica napus by a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (Achromobacter sp.). Can J Microbiol 46:229–236 ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biermann B, Linderman RG (1983) Mycorrhizal roots, intraradical vesicles and extraradical vesicles as inoculum. New Phytol 95:97–105 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Biocyclopedia (2018). https://biocyclopedia.com/index/biotechnology/plant_biotechnology/biofertilizers/biotech_procedures_of_biofertilizer.php
• Biotech International Limited (2018). https://www.biotech-int.com/biofertilizers.html
• Boddey RM, de Oliveira OC, Urquiaga S, Reis VM, Olivares FL, Baldani VLD, Döbereiner J (1995) Biological nitrogen fixation associated with sugar cane and rice: contributions and prospects for improvement. Plant Soil 174:195–209 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Boddey RM, Da Silva LG, Reis V, Alves BJR, Urquiaga S (2000) Assessment of bacterial nitrogen fixation in grass species. In: Triplett EW (ed) Prokaryotic nitrogen fixation: a model system for analysis of a biological process. Horizon Scientific Press, Wymondham, pp 705–726 Google Scholar
• Boulter JI, Trevors JT, Boland GJ (2002) Microbial studies of compost: bacterial identification, and their potential for turfgrass pathogen suppression. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 18:661–671 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Cakmak I (2008) Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: agronomic or genetic biofortification? Plant Soil 302:1–17 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Cakmakci R, Dönmez MF, Erdoğan Ü (2007) The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on barley seedling growth, nutrient uptake, some soil properties, and bacterial counts. Turk J Agric For 31:189–199 CASGoogle Scholar
• Chen JH (2006) The combined use of chemical and organic fertilizers and/or biofertilizer for crop growth and soil fertility. In: International workshop on sustained management of the soil-rhizosphere system for efficient crop production and fertilizer use. Land Development Department Bangkok, Thailand, 16, p 20 Google Scholar
• Cox CD, Adams PA (1985) Siderophore activity of pyoverdin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Immun 48:130–138 CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
• Davis RD (1996) The impact of EU and UK environmental pressures on the future of sludge treatment and disposal. Water Environ J 10:65–69 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Dawson JO (1986) Actinorhizal plants: their use in forestry and agriculture. Outlook Agr 15:202–208 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• De Freitas JR, Banerjee MR, Germida JJ (1997) Phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria enhance the growth and yield but not phosphorus uptake of canola (Brassica napus L.). Biol Fertil Soils 24:358–364 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• De Meyer G, Höfte M (1997) Salicylic acid produced by the rhizobacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2 induces resistance to leaf infection by Botrytis cinerea on bean. Phytopathology 87:588–593 ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diagne N, Arumugam K, Ngom M, Nambiar-Veetil M, Franche C, Narayanan K, Laplaze L (2013) Use of Frankia and actinorhizal plants for degraded lands reclamation. Biomed Res Int 2013 Google Scholar
• Dommergues YR (1995) Nitrogen fixation by trees in relation to soil nitrogen economy. Fertil Res 42:215–230 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Edgerton M (2009) Increasing crop productivity to meet global needs for feed, food, and fuel. Plant Physiol 149:7–13 ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
• Etesami H, Emami S, Alikhani HA (2017) Potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB): mechanisms, promotion of plant growth, and future prospects, a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 17:897–911 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Gallon JR (2001) N2 fixation in phototrophs: adaptation to a specialized way of life. Plant Soil 230:39–48 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Gaur A, Adholeya A (2000) Effects of the particle of soil-less substrates upon AM fungus inoculum production. Mycorrhiza 10:43–48 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Giller KE, Witter E, Mcgrath ST (1998) Toxicity of heavy metals to microorganisms and microbial processes in agricultural soils: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1389–1414 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Goldstein AH, Braverman K, Osorio N (1999) Evidence for mutualism between a plant growing in a phosphate-limited desert environment and a mineral phosphate solubilizing (MPS) rhizobacterium. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 30:295–300 ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham PH, Vance CP (2000) Nitrogen fixation in perspective: an overview of research and extension needs. Field Crops Res 65:93–106 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Gutierez-Mañero FJ, Ramos-Solano B, Probanza A, Mehouachi J, Tadeo FR, Talon M (2001) The plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus licheniformis produce high amounts of physiologically active gibberellins. Physiol Plant 111:206–211 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Hashem MA (2001) Problems and prospects of cyanobacterial biofertilizer for rice cultivation. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:881–888 Google Scholar
• Hayat R, Ali S, Amara U, Khalid R, Ahmed I (2010) Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review. Ann Microbiol 60:579–598 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Hinsinger P (2001) Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil 237:173–195 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Hultberg M, Alsanius B, Sundin P (2000) In vivo and in vitro interactions between Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pythium ultimum in the suppression of damping-off in tomato seedlings. Biol Control 19:1–8 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Huss-Danell K (1997) Actinorhizal symbioses and their N2 fixation. New Phytol 136:375–405 ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Idris EE, Iglesias DJ, Talon M, Borriss R (2007) Tryptophan-dependent production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) affects level of plant growth promotion by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. MPMI 20:619–626 ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Indiamart (2018). https://www.indiamart.com/proddetail/reap-p-17855625762.html
• International Panaacea Limited (2018). http://www.iplbiologicals.com
• Irisarri P, Gonnet S, Monza J (2001) Cyanobacteria in Uruguayan rice fields: diversity, nitrogen fixing ability and tolerance to herbicides and combined nitrogen. J Biotechnol 91:95–103 ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jakobsen I, Leggett ME, Richardson AE (2005) Rhizosphere microorganisms and plant phosphorus uptake. In: Sims JT, Sharpley AN (eds) Phosphorus, agriculture and the environment. Am Soc Agronomy, Madison, pp 437–494 Google Scholar
• James EK (2000) Nitrogen fixation in endophytic and associative symbiosis. Field Crops Res 65:197–209 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• James EK, Olivares FL, Baldani JI, Döbereiner J (1997) Herbaspirillum, an endophytic diazotroph colonizing vascular tissue in leaves of Sorghum bicolor L. Moench J Exp Bot 48:785–797 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Jangid MK, Khan IM, Singh S (2012) Constraints faced by the organic and conventional farmers in adoption of organic farming practices. Indian Res J Ext Educ Spec Issue II:28–32 Google Scholar
• Kannaiyan S (ed) (2002) Biotechnology of biofertilizers. Alpha Science Int’l Ltd Google Scholar
• Klironomos JN, Hart MM (2002) Colonization of roots by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi using different sources of inoculum. Mycorrhiza 12:181–184 ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kundu DK, Ladha JK (1995) Efficient management of soil and biologically fixed N2 in intensively-cultivated rice fields. Soil Biol Biochem 27:431–439 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Kurrey DK, Lahre MK, Pagire GS (2018) Effect of Azotobacter on growth and yield of onion (Allium cepa L). J Pharmacogn Phytochem 7:1171–1175 CASGoogle Scholar
• Leeman M, Den Ouden FM, Van Pelt JA, Dirkx FPM, Steijl H, Bakker PAHM, Schippers B (1996) Iron availability affects induction of systemic resistance to Fusarium wilt of radish by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Phytopathology 86:149–155 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:541–556 ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malam Issa O, Stal LJ, Défarge C, Couté A, Trichet J (2001) Nitrogen fixation by microbial cruss from desiccated Sahelian soils (Niger). Soil Biol Biochem 33:1425–1428 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Malik KA, Bilal R, Mehnaz S, Rasul G, Mirza MS, Ali S (1997) Association of nitrogen-fixing, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) with kallar grass and rice. Plant Soil 194:37–44 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Mallesha BC, Bagyaraj DJ, Pai G (1992) Perlite–soilrite mix as a carrier for mycorrhiza and rhizobia to inoculate Leucaena leucocephala. Leaucaena Res Rep 13:32–33 Google Scholar
• Malusà E, Pinzari F, Canfora L (2016) Efficacy of biofertilizers: challenges to improve crop production. In: Singh DP et al (eds) Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity. Springer, New Delhi Google Scholar
• Meena VS, Maurya BR, Verma JP (2014) Does a rhizospheric microorganism enhance K+ availability in agricultural soils? Microbiol Res 169:337–347 ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menge JA (1983) Utilization of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agriculture. New Phytol 81:553–559 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Mikola P (1970) Mycorrhizal inoculationin afforestation. Int Rev For Res 3:123–196 Google Scholar
• Miller IM (1990) Bacterial leaf nodule symbiosis. Adv Bot Res 17:163–234 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Mosier AR, Syers JK, Freney JR (eds) (2004) SCOPE 65, agriculture and the nitrogen cycle: assessing the impacts of fertilizer use on food production and the environment. Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment Series, vol 65. Workshop held by the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment in Kampala, Uganda Google Scholar
• Nash PR, Motavalli PP, Nelson KA (2012) Nitrous oxide emissions from claypan soils due to nitrogen fertilizer source and tillage/fertilizer placement practices. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:983–993 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• National fertilizers limited (2018). http://www.nationalfertilizers.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=140&Itemid=156&lang=en
• Ngampimol H, Kunathigan V (2008) The study of shelf life for liquid biofertilizer from vegetable waste. Au J T 11:204–208 Google Scholar
• Okon Y (1985) Azospirillum as a potential inoculant for agriculture. Trends Biotechnol 3:223–228 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Okon Y, Labandera-Gonzalez CA (1994) Agronomic applications of Azospirillum: an evaluation of 20 years worldwide field inoculation. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1591–1601 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Pindi PK, Satyanarayana SDV (2012) Liquid microbial consortium – a potential tool for sustainable soil health. J Biofertil Biopestici 3:124 Google Scholar
• Polyanskaya LM, Vedina OT, Lysak LV, Zvyagintsev DG (2002) The growth-promoting effects of Beijerinckia mobilis and Clostridium sp. cultures on some agricultural crops. Microbiology 71:109–115 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Redecker D, Thierfelder H, Werner D (1995) A new cultivation system for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on glass beads. Angew Bot 69:189–191 Google Scholar
• Richardson AE (2001) Prospects for using soil microorganisms to improve the acquisition of phosphorus by plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:897–906 Google Scholar
• Rillig MC, Wright SF, Eviner VT (2002) The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and glomalin in soil aggregation: comparing effects of five plant species. Plant Soil 238:325–333 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Roper MM, Gault RR, Smith NA (1995) Contribution to the N status of soil by free-living N2-fixing bacteria in a Lucerne stand. Soil Biol Biochem 27:467–471 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Ryan MH, Graham JH (2002) Is there a role for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in production agriculture? Plant Soil 244:263–271 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Schachtman DP, Reid RJ, Ayling SM (1998) Phosphorus uptake by plants: from soil to cell. Plant Physiol 116:447–453 ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
• Schultz RC, Colletti JP, Faltonson RR (1995) Agroforestry opportunities for the United States of America. Agrofor Syst 31:117–142 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Schwencke J, Carù M (2001) Advances in actinorhizal symbiosis: host plant–Frankia interactions, biology, and applications in arid land reclamation: a review. Arid Land Res Manage 15:285–327 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Schwintzer CR, Tjepkema JD (1990) The biology of Frankia and actinorhizal plants. Academic Press, San Diego, CA Google Scholar
• Sethi SK, Sahu JK, Adhikary SP (2014) Microbial biofertilizers and their pilot-scale production. Microbial Biotechnol Progr Trends 297 Google Scholar
• Sharma SB, Sayyed RZ, Trivedi MH, Gobi TA (2013) Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springerplus 2:587 ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
• Singh I, Giri B (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhiza mediated control of plant pathogens. In: Mycorrhiza – Nutrient uptake, biocontrol, ecorestoration. Springer, Cham, pp 131–160 ChapterGoogle Scholar
• Singh S, Singh BK, Yadav SM, Gupta AK (2014) Potential of biofertilizers in crop production in Indian agriculture. Am J Plant Nutr Fertil Technol 4:33–40 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Smith SE, Read DJ (1997) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, London Google Scholar
• Smolander A, Sarsa ML (1990) Frankia strains of soil under Betula pendula: behaviour in soil and in pure culture. Plant Soil 122:129–136 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Socolow RH (1999) Nitrogen management and the future of food: lessons from the management of energy and carbon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:6001–6008 ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
• Spaink HP, Kondorosi A, Hooykaas PJJ (eds) (1998) The Rhizobiaceae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Google Scholar
• Sprent JI, Parsons R (2000) Nitrogen fixation in legume and non-legume trees. Field Crops Res 65:183–196 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Stamford NP, Ortega AD, Temprano F, Santos DR (1997) Effects of phosphorus fertilization and inoculation of Bradyrhizobium and mycorrhizal fungi on growth of Mimosa caesalpiniaefolia in an acid soil. Soil Biol Biochem 29:959–964 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Stephens JHG, Rask HM (2000) Inoculant production and formulation. Field Crops Res 65:249–258 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Sundara B, Natarajan V, Hari K (2002) Influence of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on the changes in soil available phosphorus and sugar cane and sugar yields. Field Crops Res 77:43–49 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Sylvia DM (1990) Inoculation of native woody plants with vesicular–arbuscular fungi for phosphate mine land reclamation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 31:847–897 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Taylor AG, Harman GE (1990) Concepts and technologies of selected seed treatments. Annu Rev Phytopathol 28:321–339 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Thakur P, Singh I (2018) Biocontrol of soilborne root pathogens: an overview. In: Root biology, soil biology. Springer, pp 181–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75910-4_7Google Scholar
• Timmusk S, Nicander B, Granhall U, Tillberg E (1999) Cytokinin production by Paenobacillus polymyza. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1847–1852 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Timmusk S, Behers L, Muthoni J, Muraya A, Aronsson A (2017) Perspectives and challenges of microbial application for crop improvement. Front Plant Sci 8:49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00049ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
• Torrey JG (1978) Nitrogen fixation by actinomycete-nodulated angiosperms. Bioscience 28:586–592 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Triplett E (1996) Diazotrophic endophytes: progress and prospects for nitrogen fixation in monocots. Plant Soil 186:29–38 ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
• Unkovich MJ, Pate JS (2000) An appraisal of recent field measurements of symbiotic N2 fixation by annual legumes. Field Crops Res 65:211–228 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Unkovich MJ, Pate JS, Sanford P (1997) Nitrogen fixation by annual legumes in Australian Mediterranean agriculture. Aust J Agric Res 48:267–293 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Vance CP (1998) Legume symbiotic nitrogen fixation: agronomic aspects. In: Spaink HP (ed) The Rhizobiaceae. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 509–530 ChapterGoogle Scholar
• Vance CP (2001) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition. Plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable sources. Plant Physiol 127:390–397 ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
• Vande Broek A, Dobbelaere S, Vanderleyden J, Vandommelen A (2000) Azospirillum–plant root interactions: signaling and metabolic interactions. In: Triplett EW (ed) Prokaryotic nitrogen fixation: a model system for analysis of a biological process. Horizon Scientific Press, Wymondham, pp 761–777 Google Scholar
• Wall LG (2000) The actinorhizal symbiosis. J Plant Growth Regul 19:167–182 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wani SA, Chand S, Ali T (2013) Potential use of Azotobacter chroococcum in crop production: an overview. Curr Agric Res 1:35–38 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• White DP (1941) Prairie soil as a medium for tree growth. Ecology 22:398–407 ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Wilde HE (1944) Mycorrhizae and silviculture. J For 42:290 Google Scholar
• Wood T, Cummings B (1992) Biotechnology and the future of VAM commercialization. In: Allen MF (ed) Mycorrhizal functioning. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 468–487 Google Scholar
• Yu G, Ran W, Shen Q (2016) Compost process and organic fertilizers application in China. In: Organic fertilizers – From Basic concepts to applied outcomes. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/62324Google Scholar
• Zahran HH (1999) Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:968–989 CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Botany, Hansraj College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India Lebin Thomas & Ishwar Singh

1. Lebin Thomas

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1. Department of Botany, Swami Shraddhanand College University of Delhi, New Delhi, India Bhoopander Giri
2. Amity Institute of Microbial Technology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India Ram Prasad
3. College of Horticulture and Gardening, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China Qiang-Sheng Wu
4. Amity Institute of Microbial Technology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India Ajit Varma

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, L., Singh, I. (2019). Microbial Biofertilizers: Types and Applications. In: Giri, B., Prasad, R., Wu, QS., Varma, A. (eds) Biofertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture and Environment . Soil Biology, vol 55. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18933-4_1

Download citation

• .RIS
• .ENW
• .BIB

• DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18933-4_1
• Published : 10 August 2019
• Publisher Name : Springer, Cham
• Print ISBN : 978-3-030-18932-7
• Online ISBN : 978-3-030-18933-4
• eBook Packages : Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Get shareable link

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative